Under federal law, which statement about trained and certified applicators is true?

Trained and certified applicators play a crucial role in the responsible use of pesticides, especially restricted use pesticides (RUPs). They undergo specific training and certification to ensure they have the necessary knowledge in safe handling, application techniques, and environmental considerations. Under federal law, particularly the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), certified applicators are authorized to apply restricted use pesticides on their own or under their supervision.

This provision allows certified applicators a degree of independence in their work, ensuring that they can efficiently manage pest control while adhering to safety guidelines. Their training ensures that they can assess situations and make informed decisions regarding pesticide applications, which is vital for protecting human health and the environment.

The other statements present limitations or misconceptions regarding the capabilities and regulations surrounding trained and certified applicators. For instance, the notion of requiring direct supervision could undermine their training and autonomy. Additionally, the restriction on applying pesticides in residential areas does not align with their certification, as that is typically permitted under regulations. Furthermore, requiring annual re-certification without exceptions is not a federal mandate; it varies by state and may not be as stringent in every jurisdiction.